Interest rates: A change of heart at the MPC?

The Monetary Policy Committee of the Reserve Bank (MPC) as expected left the Reserve Bank repo rate unchanged yesterday. While the rate was unchanged the tone of the MPC statement and of the answers to the questions posed by journalists at the media conference was very different, in our estimation, from the previous meeting. Interest rate increases were clearly very far from the minds of the MPC. The pause button on short term rates remains very much in place. The focus of the statement and the subsequent discussion was clearly on the risks to the growth and employment outlook for the SA economy rather than the risks to the inflation outlook. This was despite the inflation forecasts being revised upwards in response to higher oil and fuel prices on global markets: these are expected to approach the upper band of its 3-6 percent inflation target band.

The money market and bond market will have to revise its view of the timing of the next increase in short term rates and was in the process of doing so yesterday. Higher policy determined interest rates will be postponed until the outlook for the economy can be predicted with greater confidence and the economy is operating much closer to its potential. We regard this evidence of Reserve Bank restraint as entirely appropriate and very encouraging for the outlook for the real SA economy. Most importantly from our perspective is the explicit recognition that these price pressures are of the cost push variety rather than of demand pull variety. To quote the MPC statement: “Since the previous meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee, the risks to the outlook for domestic inflation have increased on the upside, mainly as a result of cost push pressures. The domestic growth prognosis has improved, and the recovery is expected to be sustained, although not at rates sufficient to make appreciable inroads into the unemployment situation in South Africa.

“…….At this stage there are no discernible inflationary pressures coming from the demand side of the economy….”

And in concluding remarks:

“…The MPC is of the view that the risks to the inflation outlook are on the upside. However, these risks and underlying pressures are mainly of a cost push nature…”.

To further quote the MPC:

“The trajectory of the CPI forecast of the Bank has changed somewhat since the previous meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee. Nevertheless, inflation is still expected to remain within the target range over the entire forecast period. Inflation is now expected to average 4,7 per cent in 2011 and 5,7 per cent in 2012. This represents an upward adjustment of approximately half a percentage point in both 2011 and 2012. Inflation is expected to peak at 5,8 per cent in the first quarter of 2012 before declining to 5,6 per cent in the fourth quarter. The upward adjustment is mainly due to revised assumptions regarding the international oil price over the forecast period.”

What monetary policy can’t do
Presumably the Bank has referred to cost push rather than demand pull forces on the inflation rate because monetary policy and interest rates can do little to influence cost push pressures on prices in the short run or over the relevant forecast period. This important distinction was not one easily made by the MPC before when it would refer to the danger to inflation itself of inflationary expectations themselves. Such references were happily absent this time. It has always seemed to us an argument not at all well supported by the evidence. That is inflationary expectations, as surveyed, or inflation compensation made available at the longer end of the bond market, have been largely impervious (almost always about 6% pa) to the direction of inflation itself: this has moved sharply in both directions over recent years.

The only time when inflation compensation in the bond market (being the difference between yields on conventional government bonds and inflation protected yields) moved sharply lower and then higher was at the height of the global financial crisis when risk aversion and deflation, rather than inflation itself, became the primary concern of investors.

The MPC has become anxious about the global economy and therefore the dangers of what it regards as an increasingly uncertain global economy for the SA economy where a modest recovery is now under way. The troubled sense of the MPC view of the world and of the dangers this represents for the SA economy is well captured by the following observations made in its statement: “The global economic recovery, although uneven, is expected to continue, led by a strong performance in global manufacturing. However significant downside risks remain, due to the confluence of shocks that have the potential to stall the nascent recovery. Growth in emerging markets remains robust, but Asian economies in particular may be negatively impacted by the recent developments in Japan. The global growth outlook may also be dependent on the extent to which the authorities in China manage to slow their economy down.

“….Domestic growth prospects appear to have improved moderately. Real gross domestic product grew by 2,8 per cent in 2010, and at an annualised rate of 4,4 per cent in the fourth quarter. The forecast of the Bank has increased somewhat since the previous meeting of the MPC, with GDP now expected to average 3,7 per cent and 3,9 per cent in 2011 and 2012 respectively. These growth rates, while an improvement, are still too low to have a significant impact on the unemployment rate which measured 24,0 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2010….. There are indications that although consumption expenditure growth will remain relatively robust, it is unlikely to accelerate to excessive levels in the short term…..The various house price indices all indicate that house prices are either falling or increasing at very low nominal rates. This, combined with the recent decline in equity prices, may contribute to a moderation of the impact of wealth effects on consumption.”

We welcome the emphasis the MPC is placing on the state of the economy and on the absence of demand side pressures on the economy. There is much more than inflation at risk for the SA economy and the Reserve Bank has made this very clear. This represents good news for the SA economy and we are confident that what we would regard as a change of heart of the Reserve Bank will be well received in the market place, including the currency market. Initial reactions in the bond and currency markets were positive and they are likely to remain constructive. Brian Kantor

Inflation and interest rates: The glass is half full

While headline annual consumer inflation was unchanged at 3.7% in February, the underlying trend indicates a somewhat faster rate of inflation of about 4.2%. These trends may be calculated as the monthly move in the seasonally adjusted and smoothed CPI, which is then annualised, or as the quarter to quarter annualised increases in the CPI. Both are running at a similar rate of above 4%. If the current trends are sustained the inflation rate will approach 5% over the next 12 months.


To view the graphs and tables referred to in the article, see Daily Ideas in todays Daily View:

Daily View 24 March – Inflation and Interest Rates

The forces pushing up prices are in part global in the form of rising dollar prices for food and energy. These, as the Reserve Bank pointed out in its Quarterly Bulletin, have been rising sharply as a result of increased demands and some supply side disruptions or expected disruptions in the supply of oil from the Middle East.

Breaking down the February data
The counter to such pressures has been the strength of the rand over the past 12 months. This counter pressure has been more effective in the case of food and less so for the petrol price. The food price component of the CPI is up by 3.6% compared to a year ago. Food prices actually fell by 0.1% in February 2011. The petrol price rose by 3.1% in February and higher oil prices, as well as higher excise taxes on petrol, took the year on year increase in petrol prices to 12.1%.

Food and non-alcoholic beverages account for 15.68% of the CPI basket while transport costs have a large weight of 18.8%. However Purchase of Vehicles carries by far the largest component of transport costs with a weight in the basket of 11.8% out of the 18.8% allocated to transport generally. Petrol has a weight of 3.93% and Public transport also influenced by the petrol and diesel prices has a 2.73% share of the CPI.

Owing to the downward pressure the strong rand placed on new vehicle prices, the overall transport component only increased by 2.6% over the past 12 months despite the higher petrol price. Including the prices of new vehicles rather than their implicit or explicit leasing or rental rates is surely an anomaly in the calculation of the CPI. It is the opportunity implicit or explicit leasing costs of owning a vehicle rather than the price of a vehicle that matters to households. The price of a new or used car furthermore is hardly something clearly indicated on any price list. It will be affected by financial arrangements and by warranties as well as residual and trade in values, all designed to help make a sale.

This anomaly (rentals or prices) is avoided in the case of another important category that makes up the CPI. That is the item Owners’ Equivalent Rent that makes up 12.21% of the basket with Actual rentals for housing making up a further 3.49% of the basket. Electricity prices, which rose by 18.6% over the past 12 months, have a weight of but 1.87%. Actual rents are estimated to have increased by 5.4% and owners’ equivalent rents by 3.9% over the past 12 months. Rentals were unchanged in February, presumably because they were not surveyed last month.

The future of rentals and the rate of inflation will be determined by the state of the housing market. Short term interest rates and the availability of mortgage bonds will clearly influence house prices, rents and rental returns and these will take their cue from the rand. However if house prices rise rapidly landlords may well accept a lower rental rate of return and vice versa. When house prices fall rental may prove much stickier leaving the direction of rentals somewhat independent of house price inflation.

Nevertheless home owners are likely to spend more rather than less as their balance sheets improve with higher house prices, which is unlike the case when most other prices rise. Higher (relative) prices generally restrain rather than encourage extra demands.

The right medicine
This brings attention to the most important contributor to the monthly increase of 0.7% in the CPI. Increased costs of insurance, especially medical insurance, rose by 5.2% in the month and contributed 0.4 percentage points of the increase in prices. These insurance costs are also only surveyed annually rather than monthly and revealed a year on year increase of 4.2%. Are not such increases reflective of the increasing real shortages of skilled medical personnel rather than demand side pressures on prices?

Such shortages of skills are exacerbated by the difficulties imposed by our immigration policies. They show up also in the rate of inflation of educational services provided to households. Primary and secondary education became 10.2% more expensive over the past twelve months and tertiary education was up by 7.9% over the same period.

The forces that restrain domestic inflation and the pricing power of local suppliers are the prices paid for imported goods and services and also the employment benefits received by the internationally mobile owners of scarce skills. Thus the value of the rand is the key to the underlying rate of inflation in SA.

Efforts taken to weaken the rand mean more rather than less inflation. They would also mean slower rather than faster growth, particularly in household spending, which responds favourably to lower prices and lower interest rates that follow lower prices. Growth and inflation in SA over the next twelve months will depend mostly on the global forces that determine resource and commodity prices and capital flows to emerging markets, including SA.

The most favourable outcomes for the SA economy – faster growth with low rates of inflation – will be those associated with rising commodity prices and so a strong rand. High prices for metals and minerals and inevitably also the price of oil (and also coal that we export so much of) represents good news for the SA economy. These forces proved most helpful in reviving the economy in 2010. We must hope for further fair winds to blow in from the global economy in 2011 and restraint from the SA Reserve Bank.

Equity markets: Back to square one

The nuclear cloud hanging over Japan lifted on Friday. Japan can get back to work and begin the rebuilding of its economy sooner rather than later. Relief that the radiation damage to Japan would be limited improved the outlook for the global economy to which equity markets responded very positively over the past two trading days. Equity markets are now back to the levels of 10 March, the day before the Tsunami struck.

US Treasury Bonds, and especially their inflation protected variety (TIPS), benefitted from their safe have status. This left compensation for bond holders bearing inflation risk largely unchanged. This compensation (or what may be regarded as inflation expectations) is shown in the difference between vanilla bond yields and their inflation protected equivalents.

While US Treasuries predictably acted as safe havens, so somewhat surprisingly, did US corporate bonds. The high yield, so called Junk Bonds have held up particularly well through the recent turbulence.

The strength of the US corporate bond market reflects well of the balance sheets of the average US non-financial corporation. It also speaks well of the recovery prospects of the US economy. The case for equities, especially those well exposed to the global economy, remains a strong one, given what we have argued are undemanding valuations. And given the dramatic events of the past few weeks the markets are back to where they were and therefore continue to offer value in our judgment. That the markets could absorb all that nature and engineering fallibilities threw at them, might indicate less rather than more risk to the economic and earnings outlook.

To view the graphs and tables referred to in the article, see Daily Ideas in todays Daily View: Equity markets: Back to square one

The world economy: Whither the Yen, the global economy and so the rand

The online edition of the Wall Street Journal reported this morning has the following comment:

For the first time since they joined to rescue a sinking euro in 2000, the U.S., Japan, U.K., Canada and the European Central Bank Thursday night agreed to “concerted intervention in exchange markets.” The ECB manages the currency shared by G-7 members France, Germany and Italy.
Continue reading The world economy: Whither the Yen, the global economy and so the rand

Hard Number Index: Maintaining speed

The February 2011 reports on new unit vehicle sales and the Reserve Bank note issue have been released and we are able to update our Hard Number Index (HNI) of the current state of the SA economy. As may be seen below, the economy continued to pick up momentum in February 2011.
 
The very up to date HNI is proving a reliable leading indicator of both the Coinciding Business Cycle Indicator of the Reserve Bank (updated to November 2010) and the Reserve Bank Leading Indicator of the SA Business cycle (updated to December 2010).  
  Continue reading Hard Number Index: Maintaining speed

Vehicle sales: Why a strong rand is good

It was another big month for unit vehicle sales in February. On a seasonally adjusted basis sales were ahead of the January numbers, which in turn were well up on December.
 
Year on year growth in unit sales has remained in the plus 20% range. However the quarter to quarter growth rates, which are not dependent on base effects, have surged ahead and are now running well above a 40% per annum rate.
  Continue reading Vehicle sales: Why a strong rand is good

Currency markets: Explaining the weak US dollar and the strong rand

Recent trends in the currency markets following the spike in the oil price raise two questions: why has the US dollar weakened and why has the rand strengthened? It should be recognised that the rand has gained not only against the weaker US dollar but also against the crosses, including the Aussie dollar. In the figure below we show the trade weighted value of the rand and the oil price in US dollars based to 1 February 1 2011. The oil price is up about 13% while the trade weighted rand had gained nearly 3% since the oil price spiked in mid month.

The full version of this article can be found in the Daily View here: Currency markets: Explaining the weak US dollar and the strong rand

Money and credit: Sill growing too slowly for GDP and employment growth

The money and credit statistics released by the Reserve Bank yesterday indicate that while the money supply (broadly measured as M3) is maintaining a satisfactory rate of growth of around 7% per annum on a quarter to quarter basis, credit extended by the banks to the private sector has remained largely unchanged over the past quarter. Not coincidentally, the price of the average home in SA is also largely unchanged over the past year.

It will take an increase in mortgage credit to lift house prices, while it will take an improved housing market to encourage the banks to lend more and for property developers to wish to borrow more. The trends in money and credit supply indicate that short term interest rates are still too high rather than too low to assist the economy to realise its potential output growth. And so policy set interest rates are unlikely to increase any time soon.

The lower level of mortgage interest rates and a significantly lower debt service ratio for the average SA household  (See below) still have work to do to revive the housing market and construction activity linked to higher house prices. Perhaps the authorities, now so concerned with employment growth in SA and intending to subsidise employment with tax concessions, should be reminded that house building and renovations are highly labour intensive.

For graphs and tables, read the full Daily View here: Money and credit: Sill growing too slowly for GDP and employment growth